How will end of print journalism affect old loons who hoard newspapers?
Tuesday, March 9th, 2010God, I love the Onion.
God, I love the Onion.
I’m working on this tipsheet for a presentation tomorrow at a Watchdog Workshop in Austin organized by Investigative Reporters and Editors. My boss and I are going to talk about some methods we use to fact-check stories. Check out the tipsheet and feel free to e-mail me or leave a comment if you have more ideas about improving accuracy in news stories or blog posts.
Update: For more information about setting up your own notes template that’s mentioned in the tipshseet, here’s a past post with instructions.
Mashable came out with a nice list of resources for Web-savvy mobile journalists. But the list focuses quite a bit on iPhone apps. Not everyone is cool enough for an iPhone, including me.
Here’s what I carry in my messenger bag — or as Jen calls it, my man bag:
This is what I carry around with me most of the time. If I know in advance that I’m going to be covering a story where I’ll be shooting video for online, I’ll also take my camcorder with its external microphone and tripod.
I admit I’m obsessive about carrying around my man bag, even when I’m not on the clock. You just never know when you’ll need need this stuff. What if I’m driving around and see a police chase or something? It would suck if I didn’t have all my gadgets with me.
I was able to take this video one day when I was walking to Starbucks downtown and saw two construction workers dismantling an old sign outside an abandoned store. I had walked under that sign a million times and so I thought there might be a story about this really old building being torn down to make way for something new. Since I had my camera on me, I shot some video, and since I had my notebook and recorder, I interviewed people and found out a new hotel was going to be built at the site. I had discovered a decent story about the changing character of Houston Street, from retail to tourism.
If I hadn’t had my camera on me, I would have missed the chance to take some interesting video. There was no time to run back to the office. And being able to interview people right there at the scene helped me figure out there was an interesting story happening. So the man bag filled with gadgets saved the day. And I didn’t even need an iPhone.
Brilliant.
The suit at the 18 second mark is 100 percent pure awesome.
(Hat tip: Boing Boing)
They might be right for leaving and I might be an idiot for staying. But right now, I still see the Express-News as a place that gives reporters a chance to do good work.
It seems like every day I read an online comment accusing the mainstream media of abandoning watchdog journalism. But at the Express-News, we still have a crew of skilled journalists who are paid full-time salaries to dig up stories that tell readers what’s really going on in the city. That’s huge.
Take a look at these headlines published in 2009:
The story prompted new, potentially life-saving legislation authored by state Sen. Carlos Uresti, D-San Antonio, that requires hospitals to draw up specific transportation plans for their patients, to make sure they get home safely.
The project has its own Web site, Twitter account, Facebook page and YouTube channel, and reporters are still tracking the issue with follow-up stories.
I’m not here to be a cheerleader for every decision made by the Express-News or its parent company, Hearst Corp. I’m personally frustrated by the glacial pace of change at the paper — we don’t even have an iPhone app yet, for crying out loud.
But this is still a newspaper that publishes hard-hitting investigative stories that truly make a difference. As long as it remains that kind of paper, my New Year’s resolution is this: I’m going to try to stick it out.
Paul Bradshaw wrote an interesting review of Living Stories, Google’s vision of how news should be read, shared and discussed online. Partnering with the New York Times and the Washington Post, Google has created an experiment that tries to move beyond the limitations of typical newspaper Web sites.
In this great post at Mashable, Leah Betancourt profiled five journalists, including yours truly, and asked why we use social media:
There’s a lot of hype behind measuring social media ROI. But what about the payoff on an individual basis? Those who invest time into social media on a daily basis need to see a return on that time to make it worthwhile. Journalists who regularly use social media tools such as Twitter and Facebook on the job with success make it part of their daily routine, and focus on communicating quality content that’s worthwhile to recipients.
There’s good advice for everyone in this post — not just journalists. “Though this post focuses on journalists, many of their tips can be more broadly applied to anyone working with social media tools.”
I hate celebrity news. So it should be refreshing to read the chorus of complaints about the media unfairly wallowing in the muck of Tiger Woods marital “transgressions.” Here’s what reader “w_sands” posted on an Associated Press story on our site: “Woods says he let family down:”
Is this really any or our business? If any reader of this rag had anything like this going on in there lives it probably would not be known outside of their immediate social circle. And please, no feedback that because he is a celebrity we have the “right” to know. “Right” being the key word here…where are his rights? Lost because he is a celebrity? I think not!
Normally I’d wholeheartedly agree. But there are two factors about this sordid saga that, to me, actually make this celebrity story newsworthy, at least in the early days of the coverage:
Once that falsehood was released publicly to millions of fans, the media was right to try to figure out what really happened.
I’ve stopped paying attention to the most recent titillating coverage about Tiger’s alleged mistresses. I don’t care. But in the initial days after the accident, I was glad to see TMZ correct the public record about the accident and get the truth out.
(Photo credit: Keith Allison)
Here’s a clever video that pokes fun at iPhone commercials and reminds us about the “amazing full-color display” of old-school newspapers.
The Web is amazing. It gives journalists a way to produce interactive graphics and videos, post breaking news and share conversations with readers.
But newspapers are easier to read. Newspapers offer huge photos and compelling lay outs. And you don’t need a Wi-Fi hot spot to use newspapers.
iPhones and newspapers are both cool. Just in different ways.